Loading...
Loading...
Premium Nano Banana tier built on gemini-3-pro-image, covering text-to-image and editing with readable in-image text and up to 4K output.
Sign in to run models
No output yet
Run the model to see generated results.
import requests
result = requests.post(
'https://api.e2x.ai/v1/jobs/submit',
headers={
'Authorization': f'Bearer {API_KEY}',
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
},
json={
'model': 'google/nano-banana-pro/edit-image',
'input': {}
}
)import time
job_id = result.json()['jobId']
while True:
response = requests.get(
f'https://api.e2x.ai/v1/jobs/{'{job_id}'}',
headers={'Authorization': f'Bearer {'{API_KEY}'}'}
)
data = response.json()['data']
if data['status'] == 'completed':
print('Done!', data['outputs'][0]['url'])
break
elif data['status'] == 'failed':
raise Exception(f"Job failed: {'{'}data['error']['message']{'}'}")
time.sleep(2)Nano Banana Pro is Google's gemini-3-pro-image — the top tier of the Nano Banana family, and the one we reach for when an edit has to hold up at full size. We expose its editing capability as google/nano-banana-pro/edit-image, and we charge $0.075 per edited image at 1K and 2K. That is half what the same request costs on fal.ai or Replicate today.
No source image to work from? Then you want Nano Banana Pro text-to-image instead — same model, same price, prompt only.
Here is where our price sat when we last checked it on August 26, 2026:
| API provider | Price (1K/2K) | Price (4K) | vs. E2X |
|---|---|---|---|
| E2X | $0.075 | $0.15 | — |
| fal.ai | $0.15 | $0.30 | we're 50% lower |
| Replicate | $0.15 | $0.30 | we're 50% lower |
| Google Gemini API | $0.134 | $0.24 | we're 44% lower |
We date-stamp that table because we re-check it, and because prices move.
Prices and product terms can change. Check each provider's current pricing before making a purchasing decision. Google Batch or Flex pricing is not directly equivalent to a standard on-demand API request because scheduling, availability, and processing conditions differ; it is therefore excluded from this comparison. This is a scoped comparison, not a claim that E2X is the world's cheapest option in every configuration.
Most image models treat an edit as a fresh generation that happens to resemble the original. This one treats it as composition, and you feel the difference in three places.
It holds fourteen references at once. Google splits that budget by role: up to 5 character images when a person has to stay recognisable, up to 6 object images for high-fidelity product placement, up to 3 style references. A full ad composite — model, product, brand palette — goes in as one request instead of a three-call chain you have to babysit.
It writes legible text. This is the single biggest reason we recommend Pro over the cheaper tiers for anything commercial. It renders styled, readable copy for infographics, menus, diagrams and packaging, and it handles multilingual layouts — hand it an English infographic, ask for the Spanish version, and the rest of the artwork stays put. Most image models still turn body copy into decorative squiggles.
Resolution that goes somewhere. 1K, 2K, or 4K up to 4096×4096. We price 1K and 2K identically at $0.075; 4K doubles.
One behaviour to know before you benchmark us against anyone: the model generates interim "thought images" while it reasons about the composition. Google doesn't return them and we don't bill them. It's also why you should expect roughly 30 seconds per request rather than the two or three a flash-tier model would take.
Create a key in your dashboard, keep it server-side, and post the job to our submit endpoint. We require two fields: prompt and image_urls.
curl -X POST https://api.e2x.ai/v1/jobs/submit \
-H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "google/nano-banana-pro/edit-image",
"input": {
"prompt": "Place the bottle on wet slate under soft overcast daylight. Keep the label text sharp and unchanged.",
"image_urls": [
"https://example.com/product.jpg",
"https://example.com/mood.jpg"
],
"aspect_ratio": "4:5",
"resolution": "2k"
}
}'
We hand back a job ID. Poll it until the status settles:
const headers = {
Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.E2X_API_KEY}`,
"Content-Type": "application/json",
};
const submitted = await fetch("https://api.e2x.ai/v1/jobs/submit", {
method: "POST",
headers,
body: JSON.stringify({
model: "google/nano-banana-pro/edit-image",
input: {
prompt: "Replace the background with a sunlit Milanese courtyard. Keep the subject's face and clothing identical.",
image_urls: ["https://example.com/portrait.jpg"],
aspect_ratio: "16:9",
resolution: "1k",
},
}),
}).then((r) => r.json());
const jobId = submitted.data.jobId;
while (true) {
const job = await fetch(`https://api.e2x.ai/v1/jobs/${jobId}`, { headers })
.then((r) => r.json());
if (job.data.status === "completed") {
console.log(job.data.outputs[0].url);
break;
}
if (job.data.status === "failed") {
throw new Error(job.data.error?.message || "Image edit failed");
}
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 2000));
}
Status runs pending → processing → completed, or stops at failed or cancelled. Don't want to poll? Send a webhookUrl in the submit body and we'll call you when it lands.
Two schema details that bite people: our aspect ratio default is 9:16, not 1:1, so set it explicitly unless you want portrait — and resolution values are lowercase (1k, 2k, 4k). The live machine-readable spec always carries the current schema and price.
Pro is our most expensive image editor, and it is genuinely overkill for a lot of work. Here is the honest map of what else we run:
| Model | Price / image | Pick it when |
|---|---|---|
| Nano Banana Pro | $0.075 | Text inside the image, many references, 4K output |
| Nano Banana 2 | $0.04 | Current-generation quality, no 4K requirement |
| Nano Banana 2 Lite | $0.0238 | High volume, simple edits, tight budget |
| Nano Banana (legacy) | $0.0312 | Nothing. Google shuts it down 2 October 2026 |
| GPT Image 2 | $0.0525 at high quality | Mask-based editing, or OpenAI's rendering of text |
Read that table again and notice the legacy row. Google retires gemini-2.5-flash-image on 2 October 2026, and Nano Banana 2 Lite is both cheaper and newer than it — $0.0238 against $0.0312. If you're still on the old one, that migration pays for itself twice over. We'd rather tell you that than sell you a tier you don't need.
The rest is a budget question. Pro costs roughly three times Lite. If your edits are background swaps and colour changes at social-media resolution, Lite does that and you keep the difference. If a client is going to read the words baked into the image, come back to Pro. Browse everything in the image-to-image category or the full model catalog.
The habit carried over from text-to-image is to describe the whole scene. In an edit, that instruction fights the reference and you get a drifting regeneration instead of a change.
Write the delta. Name what moves, then name what must not: "swap the jacket for charcoal wool, keep the pose, face and lighting identical" beats a full scene description almost every time. When several references go into one call, label them — "image 1 is the person, image 2 is the product, image 3 is colour grading only" — because nothing else tells the model your third attachment was a palette and not a subject.
Editing text? Quote the exact string. Paraphrasing invites reinterpretation.
Every output carries a SynthID watermark. It's Google's imperceptible provenance marker, it applies without exception, and neither we nor any other provider can expose a switch to disable it. If your pipeline runs downstream detection, or a client contract prohibits watermarked assets, settle that before you integrate.
Watch resolution defaults if you're porting a config. We default to 1K and so does fal.ai; Replicate defaults to 2K. Same price across those tiers here, but your output dimensions won't match what you assumed.
Nano Banana Pro is the product name for Google's gemini-3-pro-image, the premium tier of the Nano Banana family. It targets complex visual work — multi-reference composition, character consistency, legible in-image text, output up to 4K — rather than the fastest possible generation.
We charge $0.075 per edited image at 1K and 2K resolution, with 4K billed at double. That was our price at the August 26, 2026 check. Pricing moves, so confirm on the live model page before you budget against it.
Fourteen in total. Google caps the mix by role: at most 5 character images for consistency, at most 6 object images for high-fidelity inclusion, and at most 3 style references.
For the comparable on-demand prices we checked on that date, yes — $0.075 with us against $0.15 on both. That's a 50% saving on a like-for-like request. Different plans, batch products or promotional pricing aren't part of that comparison.
Yes. Every image from Nano Banana Pro includes a SynthID watermark, Google's imperceptible marker for AI-generated content. No provider offers a parameter to turn it off, ourselves included.
Use Pro when the image contains readable text, when you are combining several references, or when you need 4K. For background swaps and simple retouching at social resolution, Nano Banana 2 Lite costs a third as much and the difference rarely shows.
No. You submit a job, then either poll its status or give us a webhookUrl. A completed job exposes the result at data.outputs[0].url. Expect around 30 seconds of processing.